Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DLPX-88615 SSHJ - Bad packet received by server when hearbeat is enabled DLPX-88676 SSHJ - Fix false-alarm timeout exception when waiting for key exchange to complete #10

Conversation

VenkatanadhanG
Copy link

@VenkatanadhanG VenkatanadhanG commented Jan 25, 2024

Description

Currently till delphix engine version 20.0.0.0 we are using sshj version v0.31.0 and adding required patches on the version.

However due to hierynomus#916 we are required to upgrade to the latest 0.38.0 and add 2 changes for keepalive race conditions.

hierynomus#911
hierynomus#912

Note

v0.38.0 has a fix for Terrapin Vulnerability CVE-2023-48795

@VenkatanadhanG VenkatanadhanG force-pushed the dlpx/pr/VenkatanadhanG/26ba81a5-d172-4aca-b075-95cf2a8b1c0a branch from 43e08ea to 00f5ab2 Compare January 25, 2024 10:52
@VenkatanadhanG VenkatanadhanG changed the title DLPX-88676 SSHJ - Fix false-alarm timeout exception when waiting for key exchange to complete DLPX-88615 SSHJ - Bad packet received by server when hearbeat is enabledDLPX-88676 SSHJ - Fix false-alarm timeout exception when waiting for key exchange to complete Jan 25, 2024
@VenkatanadhanG VenkatanadhanG changed the title DLPX-88615 SSHJ - Bad packet received by server when hearbeat is enabledDLPX-88676 SSHJ - Fix false-alarm timeout exception when waiting for key exchange to complete DLPX-88615 SSHJ - Bad packet received by server when hearbeat is enabled DLPX-88676 SSHJ - Fix false-alarm timeout exception when waiting for key exchange to complete Jan 25, 2024
@VenkatanadhanG VenkatanadhanG marked this pull request as ready for review January 25, 2024 11:03
@VenkatanadhanG VenkatanadhanG self-assigned this Jan 25, 2024
Copy link

@nealquigley nealquigley left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants